Key result
Novel 4-layer recurrent neural network improves blood pressure prediction accuracy over traditional models.
Why the study?
Existing arterial blood pressure estimation methods do not explicitly model temporal dependencies, leading to accuracy decay over long-term prediction and frequent calibration needs.
Hypothesis-generating for deep recurrent networks in BP estimation; prospective validation required before clinical consideration.
Existing methods for arterial blood pressure (BP) estimation directly map the input physiological signals to output BP values without explicitly modeling the underlying temporal dependencies in BP dynamics. As a result, these models suffer from accuracy decay over a long time and thus require frequent calibration. In this work, we address this issue by formulating BP estimation as a sequence prediction problem in which both the input and target are temporal sequences. We propose a novel deep recurrent neural network (RNN) consisting of multilayered Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, which are incorporated with (1) a bidirectional structure to access larger-scale context information of input sequence, and (2) residual connections to allow gradients in deep RNN to propagate more effectively. The proposed deep RNN model was tested on a static BP dataset, and it achieved root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.90 and 2.66 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) prediction respectively, surpassing the accuracy of traditional BP prediction models. On a multi-day BP dataset, the deep RNN achieved RMSE of 3.84, 5.25, 5.80 and 5.81 mmHg for the 1st day, 2nd day, 4th day and 6th month after the 1st day SBP prediction, and 1.80, 4.78, 5.0, 5.21 mmHg for corresponding DBP prediction, respectively, which outperforms all previous models with notable improvement. The experimental results suggest that modeling the temporal dependencies in BP dynamics significantly improves the long-term BP prediction accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2017) studied Healthy subjects (Blood pressure prediction) (n=96). Deep Recurrent Neural Network (DeepRNN) vs. Traditional BP prediction models (PTT, SVR, DT, BLR, Kalman Filter) was evaluated on Root mean square error (RMSE) for systolic blood pressure (SBP) prediction on static dataset. A novel 4-layer deep recurrent neural network achieved a root mean square error of 3.73 mmHg for systolic and 2.43 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure prediction on a static dataset, outperforming traditional models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: