This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In the field of sub-hourly durations, and especially in urban hydrology, selecting the most appropriate form of the intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curve becomes a relevant question. In this study, two different formulations of IDF curves – that are characterized by a curvature in the sub-hourly intervals and a power-law formulation for the super-hourly intervals – are proposed in order to maximize the overall information contribution in the sub-hourly and the super-hourly domains. The proposed formulations are compared with two well-known IDF formulations, respectively characterized by a power-law and a curvature (from the power-law) formulation, calibrated only using data referring to super-hourly durations. Findings indicated that the proposed IDF curves allow to account for the different lengths of the sub-hourly and canonical data series and eventually for the different behaviour/trend of sub-hourly and super-hourly data, thus providing the best reliability indicator, at least in the investigated return period.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gnecco et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: