Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study selects typical existing office buildings in Zhengzhou, a region with a cold climate, as the research object and conducts a comparative analysis of the influencing factors of cooling energy consumption in west-facing and south-facing office spaces. A multi-stage sensitivity analysis methodology integrating global and local sensitivity methods is systematically applied to evaluate 13 key parameters across four categories: building morphology, envelope structure, shading measures, and active design strategies. Five parameters are consistently ranked among the top seven most sensitive parameters for both west- and south-facing orientations: the infiltration rate, the window-to-wall ratio, the cooling setpoint temperature, the number of shading boards, and building width. Two parameters exhibit orientation-specific differences, namely lighting power density and the external wall heat transfer coefficient in west-facing spaces, whereas shading board width and the external window heat transfer coefficient play a greater role in south-facing spaces. Local sensitivity analysis further reveals that within the parameter variation range, the five parameters with higher energy-saving rates for both orientations are air tightness, the window-to-wall ratio, the cooling setpoint temperature, the number of horizontal shading boards, and horizontal shading board width. By increasing the cooling setpoint temperature, south-facing spaces can achieve an energy-saving rate of 25.32%, which is significantly higher than the 21.77% achieved by west-facing spaces. Horizontal shading board width exhibits the most pronounced orientation difference, with south-facing spaces achieving an energy-saving rate of 16.69%, while west-facing spaces only reach 2.97%. The research findings offer quantitative scientific evidence for formulating targeted energy-saving retrofit strategies for existing office buildings in cold climate regions, thereby contributing to the meticulous development of building energy efficiency technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: