Key result
An ultrasound sonography protocol using sex, age, and two abdominal regions accurately estimated abdominal visceral fat area compared to DEXA.
Why the study?
Assessing abdominal visceral fat requires more applicable screening tools to identify individuals at risk of comorbidities, and the contribution of dietary intake to visceral fat area needed examination.
Can a practical ultrasound sonography protocol accurately estimate abdominal visceral fat area, and is it associated with dietary intake in young adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Can a practical ultrasound sonography protocol accurately estimate abdominal visceral fat area, and is it associated with dietary intake in young adults?
A practical ultrasound protocol using sex, age, and two abdominal regions can accurately estimate abdominal visceral fat area, which correlates with added sugar intake in males.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ultrasound may enable accessible VFA estimation in young adults; leaves open causal dietary links to visceral fat in males.
The assessment of abdominal visceral fat (VF) warrants more applicable screening methods to detect individuals at risk of developing comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to identify a practical ultrasound sonography (US) protocol that can accurately estimate abdominal VF area (VFA, cm 2 ) and to examine how much of the abdominal VFA can be explained by dietary intake. A 3-day dietary food recall followed by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and US scan were performed in 30 young adults. The developed regression equation ( F (4, 25) = 46.869, P = 0.001) was: (37.677 + (1.456 × Age) − (26.963 × Sex) − (11.336 × Region 4) + (13.554 × Region 6)), where regions 4 and 6 = transverse transducer placement 2 cm to the left and right of the superior border of the umbilicus, respectively (thickness defined as the distance in cm from the internal surface of the abdominal muscle to the anterior aortic wall). The regression equation had high accuracy (adjusted R 2 = 0.864) and test reliability ( r = 0.927, P < 0.001) at estimating abdominal VFA (31.4 ± 21.4 cm 2 ) when compared to the abdominal VFA (31.1 ± 21.1 cm 2 ) measured by DEXA. The intake of added sugars, only in males, was positively associated ( r = 0.671, P = 0.048) with abdominal VFA. Sex, age, and two abdominal regions are sufficient to estimate abdominal VFA in healthy adults. Examining added sugar consumption over time could aid in identifying individuals with a greater risk of developing a greater abdominal VF content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moris et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults (n=30). Ultrasound sonography protocol vs. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was evaluated on Abdominal visceral fat area (VFA) (r = 0.927, p=<0.001). An ultrasound sonography protocol using sex, age, and two abdominal regions accurately estimated abdominal visceral fat area compared to DEXA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: