Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: This study investigates cardiovascular disease risk factor response in adolescents following introduction of brisk walking into curriculum lessons. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental. SETTING: School-based. SUBJECTS: An intervention group consisted of 115 (aged 12.4 ± 0.5 y) year eight participants, and 77 (aged 12.1 ± 1.1 y) year seven and year nine participants formed a control. INTERVENTION: An 18-week cross-curricular physical activity intervention was implemented in one secondary school. MEASURES: Adiposity variables, blood pressure, lipids, lipoproteins, glucose, insulin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, high-molecular-weight adiponectin, aerobic fitness, physical activity behavior, and diet were assessed preintervention and postintervention. ANALYSIS: Dependent and independent t-tests. RESULTS: Prevalence of elevated waist circumference (9.8% vs. 6.9%), systolic blood pressure (3.3% vs. 0%), triglycerides (2.5% vs. 1.2%), and reduced high density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.7% vs. 2.7%) decreased in the intervention group. Significant improvements in high density lipoprotein cholesterol to total cholesterol ratio (mean ± SD: 2% ± 4% [confidence interval (CI)(0.05) = 1% to 2%], t(80) = -3.5, p = .001) and glucose (-.1 ± .4 mmol/L [CI(0.05) = -.2% to 0%], t(79) = 3.2, p = .002) were evident for the intervention group. CONCLUSION: The Activity Knowledge Circuit may prove to be a sustainable, effective, and cost-effective strategy to engage schoolchildren in physical activity on a daily basis. A longer-duration intervention is required to fully understand risk factor response in adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knox et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: