A modified commercial endorectal coil can feasibly act as an actuator for MR elastography of the prostate, successfully differentiating tissue stiffness in phantom and porcine models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preclinical feasibility of endorectal coil actuation for prostate MRE; hypothesis-generating for human translation.
PURPOSE: To present a novel method for MR elastography (MRE) of the prostate at 3 Tesla using a modified endorectal imaging coil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A commercial endorectal coil was modified to dynamically generate mechanical stress (contraction and dilation) in a prostate phantom with embedded phantom "lesions" (6 mm diameter) and in a porcine model. Resulting tissue displacements were measured with a motion-sensitive EPI sequence at actuation frequencies of 50-200 Hz. Maps of shear modulus G were calculated from the measured phase-difference shear-wave patterns. RESULTS: In the G maps of the phantom, "lesions" were easily discernible against the background. The average G values of regions of interest placed in the "lesion" (8.2 ± 1.9 kPa) were much higher than those in the background (3.6 ± 1.4 kPa) but systematically lower than values reported by the vendor (13.0 ± 1.0 and 6.7 ± 0.7 kPa, respectively). In the porcine model, shear waves could be generated and measured shear moduli were substantially different for muscle (7.1 ± 2.0 kPa), prostate (3.0 ± 1.4 kPa), and bulbourethral gland (5.6 ± 1.9 kPa). CONCLUSION: An endorectal MRE concept is technically feasible. The presented technique will allow for simultaneous MRE and MRI acquisitions using a commercial base device with minor, MR-conditional modifications. The diagnostic value needs to be determined in further trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thörmer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: