Key result
A novel transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography technique successfully measured aortic stiffness in vivo, demonstrating strong correlation with the reference standard applanation tonometry (R2=0.78, p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) accurately measure aortic stiffness compared to applanation tonometry in volunteers and hypertensive patients?
Population
8 volunteers and 15 hypertensive patients, as well as simple geometry and aortic phantoms.
Comparison
Transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography… vs Applanation tonometry, and other MR methods.
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
Supports feasibility of transducer-free MRE for aortic stiffness; leaves open larger validation and outcome studies before clinical use.
Observational (n=23)
No
Does transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) accurately measure aortic stiffness compared to applanation tonometry in volunteers and hypertensive patients?
Effect estimate: R2=0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.96)
p-value: p=<0.0001
A novel transducer-free MRE technique using aortic valve closure to generate shear waves can accurately measure local aortic stiffness in vivo, showing strong correlation with applanation tonometry.
Clough et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Aortic stiffness (n=23). Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) vs. Applanation tonometry was evaluated on Correlation and agreement of MRE with applanation tonometry for measurement of aortic stiffness (R2=0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.96, p=<0.0001). A novel transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography technique successfully measured aortic stiffness in vivo, demonstrating strong correlation with the reference standard applanation tonometry (R2=0.78, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: