Why the study?
Muscle MRI STIR hyperintensity in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is hypothesized to reflect inflammation, and investigators hypothesized that STIR positivity would normalize with targeted immunosuppressive therapy.
Does tacrolimus and prednisone reduce MRI STIR signal hyperintensity in a patient with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy?
Does tacrolimus and prednisone reduce MRI STIR signal hyperintensity in a patient with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy?
A 12-week course of tacrolimus and prednisone did not reverse MRI STIR signal hyperintensity or improve strength in a patient with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.
Tacrolimus-prednisone did not reduce STIR signal or improve outcomes in FSHD; leaves open immunomodulation benefit.
BACKGROUND: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a patchy and slowly progressive disease of skeletal muscle. MRI short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences of patient muscles often show increased hyperintensity that is hypothesized to be associated with inflammation. This is supported by the presence of inflammatory changes on biopsies of STIR-positive muscles. We hypothesized that the STIR positivity would normalize with targeted immunosuppressive therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: 45-year-old male with FSHD type 1 was treated with 12 weeks of immunosuppressive therapy, tacrolimus and prednisone. Tacrolimus was treated to a goal serum trough of > 5 ng/mL and prednisone was tapered every month. Quantitative strength exam, functional outcome measures, and muscle MRI were performed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. The patient reported subjective worsening as reflected in quantitative strength exam. The MRI STIR signal was slightly increased from 0.02 to 0.03 of total muscle; while the T1 fat fraction was stable. Functional outcome measures also were stable. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive therapy in refractive autoimmune myopathy in other contexts has been shown to reverse STIR signal hyperintensity, however this treatment did not reverse STIR signal in this patient with FSHD. In fact, STIR signal slightly increased throughout the treatment period. This is the first study of using MRI STIR and T1 fat fraction to follow treatment effect in FSHD. We find that STIR might not be a dynamic marker for suppressing inflammation in FSHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: