Why the study?
To summarize new contributions toward understanding the broad spectrum of manifestations of Brugada syndrome during the first years of life, ranging from asymptomatic patients referred for family history to rare children with early clinical expression.
Systematic and individualized assessment, along with age-specific risk stratification algorithms, are crucial to minimize overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Brugada syndrome in children.
Supports cautious individualized evaluation to limit overtreatment in pediatric Brugada; leaves open validation of age-specific risk algorithms.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Is to summarise the new contributions toward the understanding of the broad spectrum of manifestations of Brugada syndrome (BrS) during the first years of life. The review encompasses the screening of the asymptomatic patient referred due to family history in one extreme of the spectrum, and also the rare child with early clinical expression of the disease on the opposite side. RECENT FINDINGS: Involve specific features of pediatric BrS including the risk related to a positive family history of sudden cardiac death, the risk of presenting with syncope and the multiple diagnostic challenges of the disease. We included some of the most controversial aspects of the diagnosis and risk stratification, encompassing noninvasive studies (Holter monitors, exercise test, implantable loop recorders, and provocative tests), as well as invasive stratification during the first years of life. Finally, the role and concerns of genetic testing in this age group are commented upon. SUMMARY: The main key to minimize overdiagnosis and overtreatment in the young population with a personal and/or family diagnosis of BrS is to perform a systematic but also individualized assessment. Appropriate diagnostic guidelines need to be created and age-specific risk stratification algorithms built for the young patient both with suspected and confirmed BrS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: