Key result
Rare SCN5A mutation linked to type I Brugada syndrome and VF in a patient with CHD.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the natural history of Brugada syndrome and the association of the rare SCN5A c.3622G>T mutation with a severe phenotype requiring ICD therapy.
Suggests SCN5A c.3622G>T may cause severe Brugada with VF; hypothesis-generating, requires validation in larger cohorts.
Risk stratification of sudden death in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a controversial issue, and there is currently no consensus on the best method. Examination of data from the natural history of the disease is of fundamental importance and may help to identify relatives at risk. At the same time, study of the genetic mutations responsible for the disease may also contribute to risk stratification of the syndrome, enabling identification of asymptomatic relatives carrying mutations. This paper presents the case of a young man, aged 26, monitored as a pediatric cardiology outpatient from birth for a simple structural heart defect not requiring surgery. Analysis of the evolution of the patient's electrocardiogram revealed the appearance, at the age of 20, of a pattern compatible with type I BrS. Following an episode of syncope and induction of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in the electrophysiological study, a cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted. One year later, a single shock terminated an episode of ventricular fibrillation. A molecular study of the SCN5A gene identified a rare mutation, c.3622G>T (p.Glu1208X), recently described and associated with more severe phenotypes in patients with BrS, as in the case presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Brugada syndrome and congenital heart disease (n=1). SCN5A gene mutation c.3622G>T (p.Glu1208X) was evaluated. A rare SCN5A gene mutation, c.3622G>T (p.Glu1208X), was identified in a 26-year-old man with a congenital heart defect who developed type I Brugada syndrome and ventricular fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: