Why the study?
Traditional Chinese medicine has shown therapeutic effects in heart diseases, but its efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation required evaluation.
Does traditional Chinese medicine improve the effective rate and conversion success in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does traditional Chinese medicine improve the effective rate and conversion success in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Traditional Chinese medicine, especially when combined with Western medicine, may improve conversion rates and reduce conversion time in patients with atrial fibrillation.
TCM adjunct may improve AF conversion efficiency; extends RCT meta-analysis evidence for integrative rhythm strategies.
BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has shown excellent therapeutic effects in the treatment of heart diseases. This meta-analysis was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of TCM on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Four databases were searched from their establishment to 1 April 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of AF using TCM. The Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 was used to perform to bias risk assessment, and RevMan 5.3 was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 7 references were included. It was found that compared with conventional Western medicine, the effective rate of TCM or the combined therapy of TCM and Western medicine was higher [mean difference (MD) =1.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28 to 2.68; Z=3.26; P=0.001]; the success rate of conversion was increased (MD =1.58; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.44; Z=2.06; P=0.04), the conversion time was shortened (MD =-224.82; 95% CI: -262.56 to -187.08; Z=11.68; P<0.00001), the incidence of adverse reactions was reduced (MD =0.62; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.97; Z=2.11; P=0.03). DISCUSSION: The use of TCM to treat AF can improve clinical treatment efficiency, increase the success rate of conversion, and shorten the conversion time. Compared with conventional Western medicine, the combined therapy demonstrated better therapeutic effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: