Why the study?
Postoperative cardiac arrest occurs in 0.7% to 5.2% of cardiac surgery cases, and evidence-based resuscitation differs from standard advanced cardiovascular life support guidelines.
Does an evidence-based resuscitation protocol improve survival and reduce resternotomy rates in patients experiencing cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery?
Does an evidence-based resuscitation protocol improve survival and reduce resternotomy rates in patients experiencing cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery?
Evidence-based resuscitation protocols tailored for post-cardiac surgery patients, such as the STS guidelines, improve survival and reduce the need for resternotomy compared to standard ACLS.
Specialized protocols may improve post-cardiac surgery arrest outcomes; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
More than 250 000 cardiac surgical procedures are performed annually in the United States. Postoperative cardiac arrest rates range from 0.7% to 5.2%. This article reviews current evidence for cardiac arrest resuscitation after cardiac surgery. The evaluation included resuscitation guidelines and 22 studies identified through a MEDLINE search. Evidence-based resuscitation differs from advanced cardiovascular life support guidelines. European Resuscitation Council guidelines include correcting reversible causes of arrest, applying defibrillation/pacing before external cardiopulmonary resuscitation, resternotomy within 5 minutes if electrical therapies fail, and restricting epinephrine use to avoid rebound hypertension. A 2017 Society of Thoracic Surgeons protocol derived from European Resuscitation Council guidelines is now standard of care in the United States. Evidence-based practices can improve survival and reduce resternotomy rates. This article describes the clinical implementation of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michaelis et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: