Why the study?
This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and prognosis of patients diagnosed with low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma (LGMS) in the Japanese sarcoma network.
What are the clinical features and prognosis of patients with low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma treated with surgery or radiotherapy?
What are the clinical features and prognosis of patients with low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma treated with surgery or radiotherapy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wide excision with R0 margins is the standard treatment for LGMS, yielding excellent 5-year disease-specific survival, though radiotherapy is a viable option for unresectable cases.
This retrospective multicenter study aimed to analyze the clinical features and prognosis of 24 patients diagnosed with LGMS between 2002 and 2019 in the Japanese sarcoma network. Twenty-two cases were surgically treated and two cases were treated with radical radiotherapy (RT). The pathological margin was R0 in 14 cases, R1 in 7 cases, and R2 in 1 case. The best overall response in the two patients who underwent radical RT was one complete response and one partial response. Local relapse occurred in 20.8% of patients. Local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 91.3% at 2 years and 75.4% at 5 years. In univariate analysis, tumors of 5 cm or more were significantly more likely to cause local relapse (p < 0.01). In terms of the treatment of relapsed tumors, surgery was performed in two cases and radical RT was performed in three cases. None of the patients experienced a second local relapse. Disease-specific survival was 100% at 5 years. A wide excision aimed at the microscopically R0 margin is considered the standard treatment for LGMS. However, RT may be a viable option in unresectable cases or in cases where surgery is expected to cause significant functional impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kito et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: