New ideas about the physics of earthquakes

It may be no exaggeration to claim that this most recent quaddrenium has seen more controversy and thus more progress in understanding the physics of earthquakes than any in recent memory. The most interesting development has clearly been the emergence of a large community of condensed matter physicists around the world who have begun working on the problem of earthquake physics. These scientists bring to the study of earthquakes an entirely new viewpoint, grounded in the physics of nucleation and critical phenomena in thermal, magnetic, and other systems. Moreover, a surprising technology transfer from geophysics to other fields has been made possible by the realization that models originally proposed to explain self‐organization in earthquakes can also be used to explain similar processes in problems as disparate as brain dynamics in neurobiology (Hopfield, 1994), and charge density waves in solids (Brown and Gruner, 1994). An entirely new sub‐discipline is emerging that is focused around the development and analysis of large scale numerical simulations of the dynamics of faults. At the same time, intriguing new laboratory and field data, together with insightful physical reasoning, has led to significant advances in our understanding of earthquake source physics. As a consequence, we can anticipate substantial improvement in our ability to understand the nature of earthquake occurrence. Moreover, while much research in the area of earthquake physics is fundamental in character, the results have many potential applications (Cornell et al., 1993) in the areas of earthquake risk and hazard analysis, and seismic zonation.