Why the study?
What is the incidence and early natural history of late potentials recorded with a precordial signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction?
What is the incidence and early natural history of late potentials recorded with a precordial signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction?
In patients with a first AMI, the incidence of late potentials increases significantly by day 10, suggesting predischarge recordings are preferable for detection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor predischarge signal-averaged ECG for late potential detection after AMI; leaves open impact on risk stratification.
Signal-averaged electrocardiograms were obtained in 53 consecutive patients with a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who survived the first 10 days of hospitalization. The recording was performed twice, at Day 1 and at Day 10 of hospitalization, in patients without bundle-branch block and who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy. Signal-averaged ECGs were obtained with an instrument which analyzes the presence of late potentials (LP) in each individual precordial lead. There were 41 men and 12 women, mean age of 67 years. On Day 1, three patients had LP (5.6%). On Day 10, LP was recorded in 11 patients (21%). In only one patient was LP transient. Patients who developed LP by Day 10 (absent in Day 1) had statistically significant lower root mean square (rms) voltage and higher QRS duration than patients who did not develop LP on Day 10. In conclusion, in patients with a first AMI who survive the initial hospitalization period and are not in need of antiarrhythmic therapy have an incidence of LP of 21%. A predischarge recording is preferable since this will maximize the chances of detecting LP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strasberg et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: