Why the study?
Early cardiovascular impairment in OSA patients is often overlooked, and the feasibility and reproducibility of AFI compared with MAPSE had not been evaluated given common obesity.
Does automated function imaging (AFI) provide better feasibility and reproducibility than MAPSE for assessing left ventricular systolic function in patients with suspected OSA?
Does automated function imaging (AFI) provide better feasibility and reproducibility than MAPSE for assessing left ventricular systolic function in patients with suspected OSA?
AFI-GLS is a feasible and highly reproducible method for assessing left ventricular longitudinal dysfunction in patients with OSA, even in those who are obese.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AFI may support reproducible LV assessment in OSA; extends validation data but remains hypothesis-generating without outcome trials.
Background: Early cardiovascular impairment in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is often overlooked, leading to irreversible outcome. Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) derived from automated function imaging (AFI) echocardiography provides a fast tool to assess global longitudinal function. We therefore aimed to compare the feasibility and reproducibility of AFI with mitral annulus plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) as obesity is common in OSA. Methods: A comprehensive echocardiographic examination was done in 186 consecutive patients having polysomnography for suspected OSA in this prospective study. MAPSE was measured by using M-mode. AFI was derived by offline analysis of three long-axis views that semi-automatically detects LV endocardial boundary, which is adjusted manually as necessary. Variability of AFI and MAPSE were compared among the different subgroups and further tested in BMI subgroups. Results: Despite a relatively high obesity rate (42.9%), AFI was feasible in 94% (175/186) patients and MAPSE could be recorded in all patients. Although more segments were measured with AFI it showed excellent correlation (r=0.882) superior to MAPSE (r=0.819) between the expert and beginner. Intra- and inter- observer variability of AFI were comparable with MAPSE in Bland-Altman analysis, 5.5% and 6.5% for AFI, 6.2% and 8.8% for MAPSE, respectively. In repeated measurements, AFI showed higher intra-class correlation (ICC=0.95) than MAPSE (ICC=0.87). Furthermore, analysis showed that AFI was feasible even in more obese patients (BMI≥28kg/m2). Conclusions: Even in obese patients with OSA, AFI-GLS is feasible and more reliable for less expert operators than MAPSE for detecting LV longitudinal dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: