Why the study?
Early detection of LV subclinical dysfunction is clinically relevant in OSA patients, prompting comparison of the feasibility and reproducibility of automated function imaging versus MAPSE.
Does automated function imaging (AFI) provide better feasibility and reproducibility than MAPSE for assessing left ventricular systolic function in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea?
Does automated function imaging (AFI) provide better feasibility and reproducibility than MAPSE for assessing left ventricular systolic function in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AFI may enhance reproducibility of LV systolic function assessment by novices; leaves open clinical utility in suspected obstructive sleep apnea.
Background Early detection of left ventricular (LV) subclinical dysfunction is clinically relevant before developing irreversible impairment in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. Mitral annulus plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) is a fast tool for OSA due to high prevalent obesity; another quick but more comprehensive tool is LV global longitudinal stain (GLS) based on automated function imaging (AFI). We therefore aimed to compare the feasibility and reproducibility of AFI to MAPSE in OSA patients, as a good model in whom obesity is common. Methods A comprehensive echocardiographic examination was done in 186 consecutive patients having polysomnography for suspected OSA. MAPSE was measured by using M‐mode to calculate excursion of mitral annulus. GLS was derived by offline analysis of three long‐axis views that semi‐automatically detects LV endocardial boundary, which is adjusted manually as necessary with AFI measurement. Variability of AFI and MAPSE were compared among the different subgroups. Results Despite a relatively high obesity rate (42.9%), the feasibility of AFI was 94% (175/186) and that of 100% in MAPSE. AFI showed excellent correlation (r = .882) superior to MAPSE (r = .819) between the Expert and Beginner. Intra‐ and inter‐ observer variability of AFI and MAPSE in Bland‐Altman analysis were 5.5% and 6.5%; 6.2% and 8.8%, respectively. In repeated measurements, AFI showed higher intra‐class correlation (ICC = .95) than MAPSE (ICC = .87) ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, analysis showed that AFI was feasible even in more obese patients (BMI≥28 kg/m 2 ). Conclusions Even in obese patients with OSA, AFI‐GLS is feasible and more reliable for less expert operators than MAPSE in detecting LV longitudinal dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: