Why the study?
Existing methods often measure motion from a single source or rely on blind-source separation, prompting the development of active electrodes with individual inertial measurement units to remove motion artefacts.
Does an active electrode design using multichannel inertial measurement units and adaptive filtering reduce motion artefacts in EEG and ECG recordings?
Does an active electrode design using multichannel inertial measurement units and adaptive filtering reduce motion artefacts in EEG and ECG recordings?
A novel active electrode design using local inertial measurement units and adaptive filtering can reduce motion artefacts in ECG and EEG recordings, potentially enabling better ambulatory monitoring.
May enable ambulatory ECG/EEG monitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires clinical validation.
This paper presents a new active electrode design for electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors based on inertial measurement units to remove motion artefacts during signal acquisition. Rather than measuring motion data from a single source for the entire recording unit, inertial measurement units are attached to each individual EEG or ECG electrode to collect local movement data. This data is then used to remove the motion artefact by using normalised least mean square adaptive filtering. Results show that the proposed active electrode design can reduce motion contamination from EEG and ECG signals in chest movement and head swinging motion scenarios. However, it is found that the performance varies, necessitating the need for the algorithm to be paired with more sophisticated signal processing to identify scenarios where it is beneficial in terms of improving signal quality. The new instrumentation hardware allows data driven artefact removal to be performed, providing a new data driven approach compared to widely used blind-source separation methods, and helps enable in the wild EEG recordings to be performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beach et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: