Why the study?
Adoption of enhanced recovery protocols in clinical routine is challenging, and evaluating the learning curve of a structured implementation process in elective colorectal resections was needed.
Does a structured implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol improve adherence and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections?
Does a structured implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol improve adherence and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal resections?
A structured implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in colorectal surgery significantly improves adherence to ERP elements and reduces postoperative length of stay.
ERP implementation shows a learning curve in colorectal resections; leaves open optimal adoption strategies pending prospective confirmation.
Objectives: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) are considered as state of the art in perioperative management of elective colorectal resections. However, adoption of ERP in the clinical routine is not easy and a structured implementation process is recommended. The aim of the present data analysis was to evaluate the learning curve of the structured implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in elective colorectal resections based on adherence to recommended ERP elements and clinical outcomes. Methods: During a 12-month structured implementation of an ERP in nine hospitals, perioperative management data were prospectively documented. Patients during the 3-month preparation phase were differentiated as a comparison group with traditional management from patients during the clinical ERP implementation. In addition, the 9-month ERP application phase was divided into three equal sections. Adherence to 23 recommended ER elements and to the pre-, intra- and postoperative elements was calculated. Results: One thousand one hundred fifty-three patients (48.3 % female) were included. Traditional perioperative treatments were applied in 313 patients (preERP), while 840 patients (249, 297 and 294 during months during the first [ERP3], second [ERP6] and last 3 months [ERP9] interval) were treated according to the enhanced recovery protocol. Overall preERP ERP-adherence was 52 (IQR: 48-57)% in 9 hospitals but increased to 87 (78-91)% at the end of ERP-implementation. Functional recovery after surgery increased from preERP to ERP9, and postoperative length of stay was reduced from 7 (6 - 8) to 5 (5 - 7) days. Major improvements in overall and preoperative ERP adherence were achieved during the first 3 months, while postoperative ERP adherence took 6-9 months to reach best results. Conclusions: Structured implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol resulted in high adherence to 23 ERP-elements within 12 months. Although major achievements occurred during the first 3 months of clinical ERP utilization, a total of 9 months are needed especially to improve postoperative ERP-adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strey et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: