Why the study?
Does a smartphone pulse finger sensor agree with electrocardiography for determining ultra-short-term heart rate variability in college-aged adults?
Population
30 college-aged men (n = 15) and women (n = 15)
Comparison
Smartphone pulse finger sensor (SPFS) vs Electrocardiography (ECG)
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
SPFS may support ultra-short-term HRV assessment in young adults; extends validation but leaves broader clinical use open.
Does a smartphone pulse finger sensor agree with electrocardiography for determining ultra-short-term heart rate variability in college-aged adults?
A smartphone pulse finger sensor provides a valid alternative to ECG for measuring ultra-short-term heart rate variability in various positions.
Esco et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: