Introduction of a Standardised Admissions Template Improves Adherence to Physical Health Assessment Standards on Admission to an Inpatient Psychiatry Unit

Aims The risk of omitting an admission Electrocardiogram (ECG) in psychiatric inpatients can be high - patients may be more likely to have comorbid disease or require antipsychotic medication. Lack of an ECG represents inadequate physical health assessment, and may impact on morbidity and mortality from physical illness – impairing the ability to safely treat psychiatric illness, for example with antipsychotic medications. This audit aimed to establish achievement of admission ECG within 24hours, and to improve this if possible. Methods Two doctors gathered data retrospectively using written and electronic admission records for 41 psychiatric admissions in a one week period in September 2019. Following the first audit cycle demonstrating low levels of policy adherence, an admission proforma containing prompts and requiring a signature of the admitting doctor was introduced. Data collection was repeated on 16 admissions during September 2020 using an identical process. Results The intervention led to an increase in ECGs performed within 24hours (65% to 83% in 18-65 year olds, 52% to 60% in over 65 year olds), whilst documentation of delayed ECGs being justified and reattempted also improved (28% to 100% in 18-65 year olds, and 50% to 100% in over 65 year olds). The proforma was utilised in 75% of audited general adult admissions, and 66% of audited older adult admissions. Conclusion This admission unit was failing to meet expected standards of physical health assessment, which could result in harm. Reasons for this varied, but were attributed to inconsistent admission processes resulting in junior staff being unaware of the requirement, or miscommunication between staff. Handover of outstanding tasks occurred, but was not taken ownership of. Data collection was unfortunately impaired by reduced patient numbers secondary to COVID-19 admission processes – particularly in the older adult ward. As such some of the results in those over 65 years are positive, but may be spurious. It would be useful to repeat the audit once admission levels return to normal. The unified assessment document provided a framework for inclusion of all relevant elements and reminders for the admitting doctor. It required formal responsibility to be taken by the admitting doctor to ensure completion. Qualitative feedback demonstrated that it improved the quality and ease of admission documentation, and enabled thorough assessments which were useful when planning patient care and discharge letters. This audit demonstrated that use of an assessment proforma results in improved adherence to physical healthcare policies, and contribute towards improved patient care.