Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With sufficiently high signal-to-noise, several systematic errors become prominent in dual-comb interferometry measurements. This paper reviews several error sources including electrical, photo-detection, amplification and acquisition chain non-linearity. Sources of optical non-linearity such as self-phase modulation, cross-phase modulation and Raman soliton shifting are also covered, as are spectral fringing due to parasitic reflections and back-scattering. The non-linear response of the target sample itself can also be a source of errors. Methods to identify and minimize errors in experimental data are discussed. Good practices, instrument design strategies and tools, such as the dynamic range diagram, are suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walsh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: