There have been a number of reports of a cerebral potential occurring at about the time of an expected but absent stimulus when absence provided significant information for the subject. This potential consists primarily of a positive peak occurring with a latency of about 300 msec with respect to the time of stimulus absence and is referred to as an emitted P 300 potential. It has been conjectured that the emitted P 300 is a manifestation of the same process that underlies the evoked P 300 . Evidence supporting this hypothesis is provided by demonstrating that both the evoked and emitted P 300 potentials are similarly affected by variation in event probability. A paradigm was used in which click presence and absence provided information. The relative probability of click presence and absence was experimentally manipulated. Both evoked and emitted p 300 amplitude responded in the same way to event probability, larger for the less frequent event and smaller for the more frequent event.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruchkin et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: