Why the study?
Do new antithrombotic agents improve outcomes compared to standard dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome?
Do new antithrombotic agents improve outcomes compared to standard dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome?
New antithrombotic agents targeting alternative platelet pathways or providing long-term anticoagulation are being investigated to reduce residual risk in NSTE-ACS patients.
Highlights ongoing trials of novel antithrombotics for residual NSTE-ACS risk; does not yet inform clinical practice.
Antithrombotic therapy is a cornerstone of treatment for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, as demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. Long-term oral antiplatelet therapy targeting specific platelet activation pathways has demonstrated significant long-term benefits, whereas antithrombin use is limited to the acute setting. Despite proven efficacy of long-term dual oral antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, residual morbidity and mortality is considerable. This may be partly due to incomplete inhibition of platelet activation with current agents and/or lack of long-term anticoagulant therapy. Improvements in patient outcomes could be achieved by developing agents that inhibit other platelet activation pathways or by adding new anticoagulants such as oral anti-IIa or anti-Xa agents for a prolonged period of time after the acute event. This review describes the rationale behind and the current status of the trials with new antithrombotic agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frans Van de Werf (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: