Why the study?
Improvements in cancer treatment have increased survivorship, but survivors may face increased late-effect health problems as they age.
What is the incidence of late effects and chronic health problems in cancer survivors compared to age-matched controls?
What is the incidence of late effects and chronic health problems in cancer survivors compared to age-matched controls?
Population data highlights that cancer survivors face significant long-term health risks, including cardiovascular disease, emphasizing the need for personalized survivorship care and secondary prevention.
Supports enhanced cardio-oncology surveillance in survivors; leaves open prospective trials to define prevention strategies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Improvements in cancer treatment have led to more people living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis but survivors may have increased health problems as they age. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate population data exploring incidence of late effects for cancer survivors. RECENT FINDINGS: 18 studies were identified between 2013 and 2023 that explored the impact on survivors' physical and emotional health. Patients who had been treated at least 2 years previously for cancer had significant cardiovascular risk factors compared with age-matched controls. Women with breast cancer were more likely to have cardiovascular disease, including hypertension, arrythmias and congestive heart failure. This was associated with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab as part of systemic anti-cancer therapy. Survivors of colorectal cancer were three times more likely to have acute kidney injury than age-matched controls. Stress and mood disorders were higher in survivors of testicular cancer and prostate cancer. SUMMARY: Population studies are important to identify the 'real world' consequences of cancer and its treatment beyond clinical trials. Knowledge is critical for managing an ageing cancer population. Data to personalise cancer survivorship care, not only helps determine potential health risks, but can improve secondary prevention, emotional health, recovery, and long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faithfull et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: