Why the study?
Do reticulated platelets predict cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome patients?
Do reticulated platelets predict cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome patients?
Higher levels of reticulated platelets (IPF and H-IPF) are independent predictors of cardiovascular death at one year in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reticulated platelet indices may aid ACS risk stratification beyond GRACE; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Reticulated platelets (RP) are newly-formed platelets with a greater mass, a residual amount of RNA and an increased prothrombotic potential. No studies investigating the association between RP and the risk of cardiovascular death in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are available. In the frame of the AMI-Florence 2 study, we investigated RP in 229 (154 M/ 75 F) ACS patients (125 ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]; 104 Non-STEMI/Unstable Angina). RP were measured by using the Sysmex XE-2100 haematology analyzer and were expressed as the percentage of RP out of the total optical platelet count (immature platelet fraction; IPF) and as the percentage of RP highly fluorescent (H-IPF). At one-year follow-up, 22 out of 229 patients (9.6%) died from cardiovascular causes. Higher values of IPF (p=0.05) and H-IPF (p=0.006) were detected in dead compared to alive patients. A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis identified IPF ≥3.3% and H-IPF ≥0.9% as optimal cut-off values to predict cardiovascular death. At the multivariate model adjusted for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score, the association between RP and cardiovascular death remained significant for both IPF [OR (95%CI) : 4.15 (1.24-13.91) p=0.02] and H-IPF [OR (95%CI): H-IPF 5.03 (1.38-18.38) p=0.01]. In conclusion, RP are independent predictors of cardiovascular death and may be useful in improving risk stratification for ACS patients. Future prospective studies to evaluate the role of RP in determining cardiovascular events are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cesari et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: