Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thiols and disulfides protect both φX174 phage and its isolated DNA from the lethal action of proflavine plus light. The protective ability of these compounds appears to be attributed to the ‐SH or the ‐S‐S‐ group and the property to interact with the proflavine‐phage DNA complex. The phage inactivation efficiency per proflavine bound to DNA is reduced by 50 to 30% upon addition of cysteine or cystamine. Substances that affect the lifetime of singlet oxygen modify the rate of phage photoinactivation in the presence of proflavine; the inactivation rate is decreased by N ‐ 3 and increased by D 2 O. Irradiation under N 2 atmosphere markedly decreases the phage photosensitization by proflavine. Irradiation with monochromatic light of 440 nm is less efficient than irradiation with light of 440 nm plus 360 nm, and the difference is more pronounced in N 2 than in air. These results are discussed in relation to various possible photochemical pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piette et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: