Why the study?
Few studies have investigated the relationship between waist-to-height ratio, an effective tool for assessing central obesity, and the risk of stroke among US adults.
Does a higher waist-to-height ratio increase the risk of stroke in American adults?
Does a higher waist-to-height ratio increase the risk of stroke in American adults?
Higher waist-to-height ratio is independently associated with an increased risk of stroke in US adults, suggesting it could be a useful anthropometric predictor for stroke risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support WHtR for stroke risk stratification in US adults; leaves open prospective validation versus established metrics.
The waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is a simple and effective tool for assessing central obesity. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between WHtR and the risk of stroke among US adults. This study aimed to explore the association between WHtR and stroke. We analyzed data from individuals over 20 years of age who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2023, focusing on their stroke, WHtR, and several other essential variables. Data from NHANES were utilized to explore the association between WHtR and stroke. WHtR was calculated from measured waist circumference and height. The diagnosis of stroke was determined using self-reported data from the survey questionnaire. The primary analytical methods employed in this study included multivariable logistic regression, stratified analysis with interaction, restricted cubic splines (RCS) to investigate the association between WHtR and stroke among American adults. There were 43,278 participants, with 1,599 (3.7%) who were identified with stroke. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between WHtR and stroke risk. For each one-unit increase in WHtR, the risk of stroke increased by 8% (95%CI 1.16–3.75, P = 0.015). When WHtR was categorized into quartiles, the unadjusted model revealed that the risk of stroke in the highest quartile Q4 (≥ 0.654) was increased compared to the lowest quartile Q1 (≤ 0.525), with an odds ratio 3.01 (95% CI: 2.56–3.54, P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model, the increased risk of stroke in Q4 (≥ 0.654) relative to Q1(≤ 0.525) remained significant, with an odds ratio 1.22 (95% CI: 1.03–1.46, P = 0.025). Accordingly, there was a positive correlation between WHtR and stroke in RCS ( P = 0.925) in RCS. This study demonstrates a positive linear relationship between WHtR and the risk of stroke, suggesting potential implications for stroke prevention and treatment. Future prospective cohort studies will delve into this association to uncover the mechanisms at play.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiaohua Pan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: