Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The impact of biochar on C storage and nutrient cycling when co-applied with other non-pyrolyzed organic amendments is still uncertain. Therefore, an incubation experiment for 120 days was conducted to understand the potential of biochar for C accretion and nutrient release when co-applied with non-pyrolyzed organic materials like crop residue (rice residue) and manure (animal manure). The results of the study showed that the individual application of biochar (RB), rice residue (RR), animal-manure (AM), or their co-applications (RB+RR and RB+AM) enhanced C mineralization by 10%, 85%, 59%, 63%, and, 37%, respectively than the unamended control. Even though the input of C in RB+RR and RB+AM was 82% and 75% more compared with the sole biochar amended soil, comparatively, percentage C loss per g of C added in RB+RR and RB+AM were only 12% and 5% greater than biochar amended soil. Therefore, the results of the study indicated stabilization of C released from labile sources (RR or AM) on the biochar surface that reiterates its greater C accretion potential. Furthermore, soil available nutrients showed no significant difference between the control and sole biochar amended soil, thus validating the limitations of applying biochar individually. On the other hand, a considerable correlation between microbial biomass with plant-available nutrients in the soil co-amended with biochar and non-pyrolyzed organic materials to soil ensured greater availability of nutrients for crop uptake. Thus, co-application of biochar with non-pyrolyzed organic materials to soil could be more beneficial for soil C accretion and release of plant avilable nutrients in contrast to their individual application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dey et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: