Why the study?
Functional outcome after TAVI cannot be adequately predicted, and traditional tests or quality of life tools do not always agree and depend on non-cardiac factors. Activity tracking via wearable devices might provide a more comprehensive assessment.
Does TAVI improve objective physical activity parameters measured by a wearable device in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Does TAVI improve objective physical activity parameters measured by a wearable device in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Basic wearable device parameters like step count do not reflect the functional improvements seen in traditional 6MWT and QoL assessments after TAVI in elderly patients.
Basic wearable metrics may underestimate post-TAVI gains in elderly patients; leaves open whether refined parameters add value beyond 6MWT.
Background Due to the aging of the population, the prevalence of aortic valve stenosis will increase dramatically in upcoming years. Consequently Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedures will also expand worldwide. Optimal selection of patients who benefit with improved symptoms and prognosis is key since TAVI is not without risk. Currently we are not able to adequately predict functional outcome after TAVI. Quality of life measurement tools and traditional functional assessment tests do not always agree and can depend on factors unrelated to heart disease. Activity tracking using wearable devices might provide a more comprehensive assessment. Objectives Identify objective parameters from a wearable device (the Philips Health Watch) associated with improvement after TAVI for severe aortic stenosis. Methods and results 100 patients undergoing routine TAVI wore a Philips Health Watch for one week before and after the procedure. Watch data were analyzed offline: 97 before and 75 after TAVI. Parameters like the total number of steps and activity time did not change, in contrast to improvements in the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and physical limitation domain of a questionnaire (transformed WHOQOL-BREF). Conclusions These findings in an elderly TAVI population show that watch-based parameters like the number of steps do not change after TAVI, unlike traditional 6MWT and QoL assessments that do improve. Basic wearable device parameters might be less appropriate for measurement of treatment effects from TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eerdekens et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: