Why the study?
Does manipulated performance feedback after maximal exercise affect cardiovascular stress reactivity in competitive athletes?
Does manipulated performance feedback after maximal exercise affect cardiovascular stress reactivity in competitive athletes?
The stress-buffering effect of maximal exercise on cardiovascular reactivity is preserved by accurate or high-performance feedback but abolished by low-performance feedback.
Accurate feedback may preserve exercise's stress-buffering effect on BP reactivity in athletes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before clinical consideration.
This study was designed to assess the effect of performance feedback on stress reactivity after recovery from maximal exercise. Forty competitive athletes were recruited to complete a maximal exercise test. Performance feedback was manipulated after the exercise test to give four groups: (1) high performance, (2) low performance, (3) accurate feedback and (4) no exercise control. Cardiovascular reactivity was assessed during psychological stress. The results indicate that accurate feedback participants experienced lower relative reactivity to stress (lower mean arterial pressure) than their no-exercise counterparts. These results demonstrate that the stress-buffering effect of exercise extends to maximal exercise. In addition, high-performance participants experienced lower relative reactivity than low-performance participants. Thus, low-performance feedback was sufficient to remove the buffering effect of exercise. There were no differences between the high-performance and accurate feedback conditions, or between the low-performance and control conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John B. Bartholomew (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: