Why the study?
Chronic renal failure is associated with increased platelet reactivity and lower clinical benefit of clopidogrel, prompting investigation into the impact of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients with ACS.
Does renal impairment affect the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does renal impairment affect the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Renal impairment increases ticagrelor and its active metabolite levels after a loading dose but does not significantly alter platelet inhibition in ACS patients.
May not warrant ticagrelor dose adjustment in CKD despite higher exposure; leaves open need for dedicated ACS trials.
Background: Chronic renal failure (CKD) is associated with the presence of increased platelet reactivity and lower clinical benefit of clopidogrel. Ticagrelor has a more favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile compared to clopidogrel, which has translated into better clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We conducted a prospective mechanistic cohort study in order to investigate the impact of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in patients with acute ACS. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on their estimated renal clearances (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min and eGFR < 60 mL/min). Platelet function was determined using the VerifyNow system at baseline, after the ticagrelor loading dose and at discharge. In addition, levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite (AR-C124910XX) were determined in the first hour after loading dose. Results: 48 patients were recruited (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min: 35 and eGFR < 60 mL/min: 13). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of platelet inhibition after the loading or after 7 days of treatment (p = 0.219). However, the levels of ticagrelor and its active metabolite were lower in subjects with normal renal function than in CKD, especially at 4 (p = 0.02 and 0.04 respectively) and 6 h of loading (p = 0.042 and 0.08 respectively). Conclusion: No differences in platelet inhibition were observed after treatment with ticagrelor in patients with different renal function, although patients with renal impairment showed higher levels of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX after 4 h of the loading dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porlán et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: