Why the study?
Postoperative left atrial reverse remodelling following Cox-Maze IV procedures using cryothermy versus radiofrequency techniques remains unclear.
Does cryothermic Cox-Maze IV ablation improve left atrial size and function compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation?
Does cryothermic Cox-Maze IV ablation improve left atrial size and function compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation?
While both cryothermy and radiofrequency ablation reduce left atrial size after Cox-Maze IV procedures, radiofrequency ablation better preserves left atrial systolic function at 1 year.
BACKGROUND: Atrial linear scars in Cox-Maze IV procedures are achieved using Cryothermy (Cryo) or radiofrequency (RF) techniques. The subsequent postoperative left atrial (LA) reverse remodelling is unclear. We used 2- and 3-dimensional echocardiography (2-3DE) to compare the impact of Cryo and RF procedures on LA size and function 1 year after Cox-maze IV ablation concomitant with Mitral valve (MV) surgery. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with MV disease and AF were randomized to Cryo (n = 35) or RF (n = 37) ablation. Another 33 patients were enroled without ablation (NoMaze). All patients underwent an echocardiogram the day before and 1 year after surgery. The LA function was assessed on 2D strain by speckle tracking and 3DE. RESULTS: Forty-two ablated patients recovered sinus rhythm (SR) 1 year after surgery. They had comparable left and right systolic ventricular function, LA volume index (LAVI), and 2D reservoir strain before surgery. At follow-up, the 3DE extracted reservoir and booster function were higher after RF (37 ± 10% vs. 26 ± 6%; p < 0.001) than Cryo ablation (18 ± 9 vs. 7 ± 4%; p < 0.001), while passive conduit function was comparable between groups (24 ± 11 vs. 20 ± 8%; p = 0.17). The extent of LAVI reduction depended on the duration of AF preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: SR restoration after MV surgery and maze results in LA size reduction irrespective of the energy source used. Compared to RF, the extension of ablation area produced by Cryo implies a structural LA remodelling affecting LA systolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boano et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: