Why the study?
To compare outcomes of cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation for treating atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing correction of mitral valve disease.
Does cryoablation compared to radiofrequency ablation improve freedom from atrial fibrillation and reduce pacemaker need in patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease undergoing valvular surgery?
Does cryoablation compared to radiofrequency ablation improve freedom from atrial fibrillation and reduce pacemaker need in patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease undergoing valvular surgery?
Cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation both effectively maintain sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery, though RFA may be associated with a higher need for permanent pacemakers.
Similar AF freedom but lower pacemaker risk with cryoablation after mitral surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Objective. To compare the results of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with mitral valve disease. Material and methods. We analyzed postoperative outcomes in 79 patients with mitral valve disease and concomitant AF who underwent correction of valvular pathology, cryoablation (n=42) and radiofrequency ablation (n=37) between 2015 and 2021. Results. Effectiveness of cryoablation was 87% after a year and 72% after 2 years, RFA — 100% and 63%, respectively. The need for permanent pacemaker was 5% after cryoablation and 19% after RFA. Analysis of pre- and postoperative atrial dimensions regarding structural remodeling found significant decrease of these indicators in both groups. Conclusion. MAZE procedure is effective and safe for restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm. Annual freedom from AF was 87% after cryoablation and 100% after RFA. Atrial dimensions significantly decreased in both groups (p<0.001) that indicated structural remodeling as one of the main independent factors for maintaining sinus rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Комаров et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: