Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Genomic analysis demonstrates distinct DNA methylation signatures predict hormone receptor status in breast cancer, suggesting viable complementary diagnostic assays.
Objective: DNA methylation alterations contribute to breast cancer heterogeneity, yet their utility for distinguishing histological subtypes remains underexplored. This study aimed to identify genome-wide methylation signatures across breast cancer subtypes and develop compact probe panels for molecular classification.Materials and Methods: HumanMethylation450 (HM450) data from 99 samples (40 infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), 40 infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC), 14 metaplastic, 5 medullary) and 1,098 clinical samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) were analyzed. Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were identified using limma with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Support vector machine classifiers with minimal probe panels were developed for hormone receptor endpoints.Results: Of the 404,059 quality-filtered CpG probes, 88,909 (22.0%) were differentially methylated across subtypes (False discovery rate (FDR)\<0.05). The ILC-metaplastic comparison yielded the largest divergence (58,661 DMPs). Classifiers achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.935, 0.934, and 0.866 for estrogen receptor (ER), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and progesterone receptor (PR) status, respectively, using 8-bit polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fifteen CpG probes in internal cross-validation.Conclusion: Histological subtypes harbor distinct methylation landscapes dominated by global hypomethylation in metaplastic carcinoma. Compact CpG probe panels predict hormone receptor status with high accuracy in internal cross-validation, suggesting the potential of methylation-based diagnostic assays as a complementary approach to immunohistochemistry (IHC), pending external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdemir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: