Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Although use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS-I) is contraindicated in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, a relevant number of pregnancies is still exposed. Fetopathy in children exposed after gestational week (GW) 20 is well described, but data on long-term outcomes are scarce. Our study aims to describe postnatal and long-term outcomes after fetal exposure to RAAS-I. METHODS: We included all pregnancies in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database GePaRD (claims data; 20% of the total German population) with exposure to RAAS-I or the antihypertensives recommended during pregnancy, i.e., metoprolol or methyldopa (HYP) after GW 20. We assessed diagnoses characteristic of RAAS-I-related fetopathy in the first 180 days after birth and examined long-term outcomes of children with and without neonatal fetopathy, especially hypertension and kidney disease. RESULTS: Overall, we identified 203 live born children exposed to RAAS-I, of whom 61 were exposed to angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and 29,674 live born children exposed to HYP. Diagnoses consistent with RAAS-I-related fetopathy were seen in eight of the RAAS-I exposed newborns (3.9%) and in seven of the 61 ARB-exposed newborns (11.5%). Median follow-up in children without fetopathy was 4.0 years in both exposure groups. Among non-fetopathy children exposed to RAAS-I, three (1.5%) were diagnosed with hypertension or received antihypertensive prescriptions, compared to 176 children (0.6%) exposed to HYP. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of fetopathy is higher after fetal exposure to ARBs than to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. In a small proportion of children, sequelae of fetal RAAS-I exposure might only manifest in the years following birth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braitmaier et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: