Why the study?
Do coronary artery damage characteristics and procedural features influence the extent of periprocedural myocardial injury in patients with stable angina undergoing PCI?
Do coronary artery damage characteristics and procedural features influence the extent of periprocedural myocardial injury in patients with stable angina undergoing PCI?
This study aims to evaluate how coronary lesion characteristics and procedural factors influence periprocedural myocardial injury assessed by CK-MB during PCI in stable angina.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for lesion/procedural predictors of CK-MB injury in stable angina PCI; randomized confirmation needed before practice implications.
Patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are characterized by various degrees of myocardial damage. The purpose of the study is to investigate the dependence of micro-injuries of the myocardium on the nature of the damage to the coronary arteries and the features of the procedure during the interventional treatment in patients with stable angina. Myocardial damage was diagnosed based on the dynamics of cardiospecific biomarkers of creatine kinase-myocardial band isoenzyme before and 24 hours after intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vorobyova et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: