Why the study?
Detectability of early ischemic changes on NCCT may be limited in hyperacute stroke for both human and machine-learning evaluation, and CTA collateral status may better identify fast progressors.
Does the accuracy and prognostic value of NCCT-ASPECTS and CT angiography collaterals depend on onset-time-to-imaging in acute stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
Does the accuracy and prognostic value of NCCT-ASPECTS and CT angiography collaterals depend on onset-time-to-imaging in acute stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
In hyperacute stroke (<100 min), NCCT-ASPECTS has reduced accuracy and reliability, making CT angiography collateral status a better predictor of clinical outcome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduced ASPECTS reliability in hyperacute stroke warrants caution; hypothesis-generating for collateral assessment in thrombectomy selection.
PURPOSE: We hypothesize that the detectability of early ischemic changes on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is limited in hyperacute stroke for both human and machine-learning based evaluation. In short onset-time-to-imaging (OTI), the CT angiography collateral status may identify fast stroke progressors better than early ischemic changes quantified by ASPECTS. METHODS: In this retrospective, monocenter study, CT angiography collaterals (Tan score) and ASPECTS on acute and follow-up NCCT were evaluated by two raters. Additionally, a machine-learning algorithm evaluated the ASPECTS scale on the NCCT (e-ASPECTS). In this study 136 patients from 03/2015 to 12/2019 with occlusion of the main segment of the middle cerebral artery, with a defined symptom-onset-time and successful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) (modified treatment in cerebral infarction score mTICI = 2c or 3) were evaluated. RESULTS: Agreement between acute and follow-up ASPECTS were found to depend on OTI for both human (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.43 for OTI < 100 min, ICC = 0.57 for OTI 100-200 min, ICC = 0.81 for OTI ≥ 200 min) and machine-learning based ASPECTS evaluation (ICC = 0.24 for OTI < 100 min, ICC = 0.61 for OTI 100-200 min, ICC = 0.63 for OTI ≥ 200 min). The same applied to the interrater reliability. Collaterals were predictors of a favorable clinical outcome especially in hyperacute stroke with OTI < 100 min (collaterals: OR = 5.67 CI = 2.38-17.8, p < 0.001; ASPECTS: OR = 1.44, CI = 0.91-2.65, p = 0.15) while ASPECTS was in prolonged OTI ≥ 200 min (collaterals OR = 4.21,CI = 1.36-21.9, p = 0.03; ASPECTS: OR = 2.85, CI = 1.46-7.46, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The accuracy and reliability of NCCT-ASPECTS are time dependent for both human and machine-learning based evaluation, indicating reduced detectability of fast stroke progressors by NCCT. In hyperacute stroke, collateral status from CT-angiography may help for a better prognosis on clinical outcome and explain the occurrence of futile recanalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Potreck et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: