Why the study?
Analysing temporal strain changes in RV and LV walls post-ASD closure is of clinical importance.
Does ASD closure improve right and left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with secundum ASD?
Does ASD closure improve right and left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with secundum ASD?
ASD closure leads to significant reverse remodeling and improvement in biventricular global longitudinal strain, with transcatheter device closure showing superior midterm recovery compared to surgical closure.
May support device over surgical ASD closure for GLS recovery; leaves open superiority in randomized trials.
Background: Analysing temporal strain changes in right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) walls post-atrial septal defect (ASD) closure is of clinical importance. Aims: We aimed to evaluate acute/short-term changes in RV/LV wall deformation after ASD closure using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Methods: A total of 43 patients with ASD and 20 controls had echocardiograms before and after ASD closure. Results: Of the 43 patients with secundum ASD (mean age 27.37 years), 48.8% were closed surgically, while 51.2% underwent device closure. At baseline, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS; 2-chamber view GLS: 16.95% vs 20.73%; p=0.0001, apical long-axis view GLS 16.48% vs 20.90%; p=0.0001, 4-chamber view GLS 16.93% vs 21.56%; p=0.0001, average GLS 16.75% vs 21.31%; p=0.0001) and RV GLS (19.22% vs 24.27%; p=0.0001) were significantly lower in the patients with ASD compared to controls. After closure, the average LV GLS rapidly improved at 24 hours from baseline (16.75% to 17.28%; p=0.004), with sustained increases at 1 and 3 months (18.16% and 19.40%; p=0.001). The mean RV GLS also improved at all serial timepoints (baseline, 24 hrs, 1 month, and 3 months) with values of 19.22%, 19.85%, 20.70%, and 22.23%, respectively (p=0.0001). As compared to surgery, LV GLS and RV GLS were much better in the device group (average LV GLS at 24 hrs, 1 month, and 3 months: 16.54% vs 17.98%, 17.34% vs 18.92%, and 18.80% vs 19.96%, respectively; mean RV GLS at 24 hrs, 1, and 3 months: 17.83% vs 21.78%, 18.73% vs 22.58%, and 20.70% vs 23.70%, respectively). Conclusions: This GLS study demonstrates significant reverse remodelling of both the RV and LV after ASD closure. Device closure was associated with superior strain rate recovery compared to surgery at the 3-month midterm follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: