Why the study?
Accurate interpretation of RVLS requires understanding RV mechanics, pathology, loading conditions, and technical aspects of image acquisition and tracking.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
May aid earlier RV dysfunction detection; leaves open prospective validation of prognostic utility.
Myocardial deformation imaging has emerged as a valuable clinical tool for assessing right ventricular (RV) systolic function, providing additional diagnostic and prognostic insights compared to traditional indices of RV function. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography is currently the standardized method of choice for measuring RV longitudinal strain (RVLS) in clinical practice. RVLS provides a more sensitive indicator of subtle myocardial dysfunction than conventional parameters for RV function assessment (i.e., tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tissue Doppler systolic velocity, fractional area change, or RV ejection fraction), with utility for the risk stratification and surveillance of conditions affecting the right heart. However, accurate interpretation of RVLS requires a comprehensive understanding of RV mechanics, pathology, and loading conditions across various cardiovascular conditions, as well as the effects of image quality and technical aspects of image acquisition and tracking in RV strain measurements. This review provides an updated overview of current practical guidelines for RV strain analysis, current clinical applications, and future directions for its potential use in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelnabi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: