Why the study?
No studies had explored the risk factors, complications, and risk prediction of preoperative and postoperative traumatic coagulopathy (PPTIC) in patients with trauma.
Can machine learning models accurately predict preoperative and postoperative traumatic coagulopathy in patients with trauma?
Can machine learning models accurately predict preoperative and postoperative traumatic coagulopathy in patients with trauma?
A random forest machine learning model using routine preoperative clinical and laboratory indicators can accurately predict the risk of preoperative and postoperative traumatic coagulopathy in trauma patients.
ML models may aid PPTIC prediction in trauma; leaves open clinical utility pending prospective validation.
Background Recent research has revealed the potential value of machine learning (ML) models in improving prognostic prediction for patients with trauma. ML can enhance predictions and identify which factors contribute the most to posttraumatic mortality. However, no studies have explored the risk factors, complications, and risk prediction of preoperative and postoperative traumatic coagulopathy (PPTIC) in patients with trauma. Objective This study aims to help clinicians implement timely and appropriate interventions to reduce the incidence of PPTIC and related complications, thereby lowering in-hospital mortality and disability rates for patients with trauma. Methods We analyzed data from 13,235 patients with trauma from 4 medical centers, including medical histories, laboratory results, and hospitalization complications. We developed 10 ML models in Python (Python Software Foundation) to predict PPTIC based on preoperative indicators. Data from 10,023 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care patients were divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets, with 3212 patients from 3 other centers used for external validation. Model performance was assessed with 5-fold cross-validation, bootstrapping, Brier score, and Shapley additive explanation values. Results Univariate logistic regression identified PPTIC risk factors as (1) prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio; (2) decreased levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells, calcium, and sodium; (3) lower admission diastolic blood pressure; (4) elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels; (5) admission heart rate; and (6) emergency surgery and perioperative transfusion. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that patients with PPTIC faced significantly higher risks of sepsis (1.75-fold), heart failure (1.5-fold), delirium (3.08-fold), abnormal coagulation (3.57-fold), tracheostomy (2.76-fold), mortality (2.19-fold), and urinary tract infection (1.95-fold), along with longer hospital and intensive care unit stays. Random forest was the most effective ML model for predicting PPTIC, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.91, an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.89, accuracy of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.88, precision of 0.88, F1-score of 0.84, and Brier score of 0.13 in external validation. Conclusions Key PPTIC risk factors include (1) prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio; (2) low levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells, calcium, and sodium; (3) low diastolic blood pressure; (4) elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels; (5) admission heart rate; and (6) the need for emergency surgery and transfusion. PPTIC is associated with severe complications and extended hospital stays. Among the ML models, the random forest model was the most effective predictor. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300078097; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=211051
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: