Why the study?
Does the losartan suppression test improve diagnostic accuracy compared to the captopril suppression test for confirming primary aldosteronism in patients over 50 years old?
Does the losartan suppression test improve diagnostic accuracy compared to the captopril suppression test for confirming primary aldosteronism in patients over 50 years old?
The losartan suppression test demonstrates comparable or superior diagnostic accuracy to the captopril test for confirming primary aldosteronism in older patients.
Losartan suppression may aid primary aldosteronism confirmation in older patients; leaves open need for validation before changing practice.
OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) among the older-aged population has posed a crucial challenge. Among patients over 50 years old, this trial assessed comparability of the performance of two PA diagnostic tests: losartan and captopril suppression tests. METHODS: A post-hoc subgroup analysis from a prospective cohort was conducted by the TAIPAI (Taiwan Primary Aldosteronism Investigation) group between July 2003 and July 2006. Of the 160 patients in the cohort, 60 patients over 50 years old received captopril and losartan tests to confirm PA. RESULTS: Among the 60 patients over 50 years old, 31 patients had PA confirmed by standardized protocol. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for post-captopril aldosterone was significantly less than that for post-losartan plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) (0.87 vs 0.94, p=0.02). Using the aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR)>35 with PAC>10 ng/dl, the specificity was 82.76% vs 93.1% and the sensitivity was 77.42% vs 87.10% for the captopril and losartan tests, respectively. The equivalence between the two tests were confirmed by the exact McNemar's test (p=1.0). CONCLUSION: The losartan test showed comparable accuracy to confirm PA. Verification of this "elderly-friendly" confirmatory test will be the first step to prepare a specific diagnostic model of PA for the older-aged population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuo et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: