Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of differential dark-field microscopy (DDFM) of subgingival bacteria to correctly predict the recurrence of periodontitis in treated patients on 2 different recall schemes. The results are based on data from 51 patients on 3-month recalls (C group) and 39 patients (T group) who received periodontal prophylaxes according to a customized regimen based on DDFM of subgingival bacterial morphotypes. No significant differences were detected in the rate of recurrence of periodontitis between the 2 groups, although the incidence of disease recurrence tended to be greater in the C group. The proportions of spirochetes and motile rods observed at base line, or the average of the values observed at base line, 3 months and 6 months, were compared between subjects with and without disease recurrences. Significantly elevated proportions of these bacterial morphotypes were observed in patients of the T group who demonstrated evidence of disease recurrence during the first year as compared to subjects without disease recurrence. No significant differences could be detected in bacterial morphotypes between patients resistant to disease recurrence and those who developed recurrences at some time during the 3-year period covered by this report. The ability of DDFM of subgingival bacterial morphotypes to predict future disease occurrence was tested for 1- and 3-year periods, in both the C and T groups. The test appears to be reliable only for subjects on the experimental maintenance regimen (group T) and for prediction of disease recurrence for the initial 1-year period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Listgarten et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: