Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pulmonary surfactant apoprotein C (SP-C) is a small, unique peptide that contributes to the reduction of alveolar surface tension. Due to the extreme hydrophobic nature of this peptide it was hitherto not possible to quantify SP-C in biological samples by immunological techniques. Using a newly developed polyclonal antibody raised against recombinant human SP-C in rabbits, we now describe an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to quantitate SP-C in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Solid phase binding of the hydrophobic SP-C was achieved by transfer of the standard or BALF samples (diluted in 80% isopropanol, pH 3.5) to polystyrene microtiter plates. Sequential treatment with trifluoroethanol and methanol (2x) was employed to improve antigen presentation and to minimize the influence of phospholipids. With this assay, SP-C from human, rabbit, porcine, and bovine surfactant was detectable. No cross-reactivity of the antibody to human SP-A and monomeric and dimeric SP-B was encountered. Total serum proteins did not affect ELISA signals, as evident from spiking experiments. The detection limit of the ELISA ranged below 3 ng/ml, and intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 3.5% (n = 16) and 5.3% (n = 6), respectively. Serial dilutions of BALF showed good linearity, and excellent recovery rates were obtained upon spiking of human BALF. A mean value of 579.5 +/- 45.9 ng/ml (mean +/- SEM) SP-C was found in BALF samples of human healthy volunteers (n = 22), corresponding to 26.61 +/- 1.91 microg SP-C/mg total phospholipids (PL). SP-C levels were significantly lower in BALF of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (286.9 +/- 19.8 ng/ml [p < 0.001]; 13.92 +/- 1.93 microg SP-C/mg PL [p < 0.001], n = 48). We conclude that SP-C may be quantified with high specificity, reproducibility, and sensitivity in bronchoalveolar lavage samples by the presently described ELISA technique and that SP-C levels are significantly decreased in ARDS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: