Why the study?
The molecular mechanisms linking cardiorespiratory fitness to brain and cardiovascular health in children are poorly understood.
Does cardiorespiratory fitness alter the expression of plasma proteins related to brain and cardiovascular health in children with overweight/obesity?
Does cardiorespiratory fitness alter the expression of plasma proteins related to brain and cardiovascular health in children with overweight/obesity?
Targeted proteomics identified potential candidate proteins related to cardiorespiratory fitness in children with overweight/obesity, though differences did not remain significant after FDR correction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May link higher CRF to favorable protein profiles in children with OW/OB; hypothesis-generating for interventional trials.
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is inversely associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and brain health impairments. However, the molecular mechanisms linking CRF to health in children are poorly understood. We aimed to examine protein levels related to brain health and CVD in plasma of fit compared to unfit children with overweight/obesity (OW/OB). Eighty‐seven children with OW/OB (10.08 ± 1.1 years, 59% boys) from the ActiveBrains project were included. CRF was measured by performing a treadmill test, and children were categorized into fit or unfit. Targeted proteomics in plasma was performed using Olink's proximity extension assay technology of Neurology panel in the whole sample and of Cardiovascular panel in a subsample. Sixteen proteins (PLXNB3, sFRP3, CLEC1B, RSPO1, Gal8, CLEC10A, GCP5, MDGA1, CTSC, LAT, IL4RA, PRSS27, CXCL1, Gal9, MERTK, and GT) were differentially expressed between fit and unfit children with OW/OB after adjusting for sex, maturational status, and body mass index. However, statistically significant differences disappeared after applying FDR correction. Potential candidate proteins related to CRF levels in children with OW/OB were detected, being involved in several biological processes such as neurogenesis, immune/inflammatory response, signal transduction, platelet activation. Nevertheless, these preliminary findings should be confirmed or contrasted in future studies using larger sample sizes, longitudinal and experimental designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plaza‐Florido et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: