Why the study?
Data were lacking on the performance of MRI-derived proton density fat fraction to classify more advanced forms of the MASLD spectrum.
Does MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) accurately diagnose MASLD, MASH, and fibrotic MASH in adults with severe obesity?
Does MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) accurately diagnose MASLD, MASH, and fibrotic MASH in adults with severe obesity?
MRI-derived PDFF is a highly accurate noninvasive biomarker for diagnosing MASLD, MASH, and fibrotic MASH in adults with severe obesity, outperforming other single classifiers.
PDFF may aid noninvasive MASLD staging in obesity; leaves open its clinical adoption pending validation studies.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prior work has shown that MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) can diagnose metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) noninvasively, but there is a paucity of data on the performance of PDFF to classify more advanced forms of the MASLD spectrum. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of PDFF for the diagnoses of MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and fibrotic MASH in adults with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, using contemporaneous intraoperative liver biopsy as a reference. APPROACH AND RESULTS: PDFF was evaluated alone and with other potential classifiers (imaging, serum and anthropometric), using Bayesian Information Criterion-based stepwise logistic regression models. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) were computed for all models and single classifiers. Cross-validated sensitivity and specificity were calculated at Youden-based PDFF classification thresholds. Data analysis from 140 patients demonstrated that PDFF was the most accurate single classifier, with high AUC for MASLD (0.95), MASH (0.85), and fibrotic MASH (0.82) (all p <0.001). Multivariable models, including PDFF, outperformed those without PDFF. The Youden-based threshold for PDFF was 4.4% for MASLD (sensitivity: 87%, specificity: 86%), 6.9% for MASH (sensitivity: 77%, specificity: 66%), and 13.5% for fibrotic MASH (sensitivity: 67%, specificity: 85%). CONCLUSIONS: PDFF was the most accurate single classifier for diagnosing MASLD, MASH, and fibrotic MASH. The most accurate multivariable classification models for MASLD, MASH, and fibrotic MASH included PDFF, demonstrating the central importance of PDFF for noninvasive assessment of the MASLD spectrum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolfson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: