Why the study?
Does AT1 or AT2 receptor antagonism reduce bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice?
Does AT1 or AT2 receptor antagonism reduce bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice?
Both AT1 and AT2 receptor antagonists independently reduce bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice through different mechanisms, suggesting potential therapeutic targets for interstitial pneumonia.
AT1/AT2 antagonism attenuates murine fibrosis; hypothesis-generating for human interstitial lung disease targets, pending clinical validation.
BACKGROUND: The role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2) in pulmonary fibrosis is unknown. To evaluate the influence of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) and AT2 antagonists in a mouse model of bleomycin (BLM)-induced pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: We examined effects of the AT1 antagonist (AT1A) olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) and the AT2 antagonist (AT2A) PD-123319 on BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis, which was evaluated by Ashcroft's pathological scoring and hydroxyproline content of lungs. We also analyzed the cellular composition and cytokine levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). RESULTS: With olmesartan, the lung fibrosis score and hydroxyproline level were significantly reduced, and lymphocyte and neutrophil counts and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha levels in BALF were reduced on day 7. On day 14, macrophage and lymphocyte counts in BALF were reduced, accompanied by a reduction in the level of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1. With PD-123319, the lung fibrosis score and hydroxyproline level were reduced. On day 7, macrophage, lymphocyte, and neutrophil counts in BALF were reduced, accompanied by reductions in TNF-alpha and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 levels. On day 14, macrophage, lymphocyte, and neutrophil counts in BALF were also reduced, accompanied by a reduction in the level of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 level but not TGF-beta1. CONCLUSION: Both AT1 and AT2 are involved in promoting interstitial pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis via different mechanisms of action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waseda et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: