Why the study?
Reports on prognostic markers for preoperative evaluation in dogs undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for myxomatous mitral valve disease remain limited.
Do preoperative NT-proBNP and cTnI levels predict procedure safety in dogs with MMVD undergoing TEER?
Do preoperative NT-proBNP and cTnI levels predict procedure safety in dogs with MMVD undergoing TEER?
Preoperative NT-proBNP and cTnI levels do not appear to be strong predictors of procedure safety in dogs undergoing TEER for MMVD.
May not predict TEER safety in dogs with MMVD; leaves open validation of alternative biomarkers in prospective studies.
Myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) in dogs can be treated with transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER), an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique. However, reports on prognostic markers for preoperative evaluation remain limited. This study evaluated the association of preoperative N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels with procedure safety in dogs undergoing TEER. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 25 dogs diagnosed with stage C (n = 18) or D (n = 7) MMVD that underwent TEER between September 2023 and January 2025. Preoperative NT-proBNP and cTnI values were measured and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Among the survivors, 15 and 4 dogs were stages C and D, respectively. Among the non-survivors, three and three dogs were stages C and D, respectively. Non-survivors had higher median NT-proBNP levels (3557 pmol/L; range: 774–10,000) and cTnI levels (0.39 ng/mL; range: 0.22–0.51) than survivors (NT-proBNP: 1262.6 pmol/L, range: 500–8773; cTnI: 0.1 ng/mL, range: 0.01–3.6). However, the two groups showed no significant differences in NT-proBNP (p = 0.187) or cTnI (p = 0.869). Increased preoperative NT-proBNP and cTnI levels were not strong predictors of procedure safety in dogs with MMVD stages C and D undergoing TEER. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to better evaluate the prognostic value of these biomarkers in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: