Why the study?
The study aimed to identify factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on DOACs and develop a risk score to provide an effective clinical assessment tool.
Does the Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score better predict gastrointestinal bleeding compared to the HAS-BLED score in patients on DOACs?
Does the Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score better predict gastrointestinal bleeding compared to the HAS-BLED score in patients on DOACs?
A newly developed 12-factor risk score (Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB) demonstrated better predictive value for gastrointestinal bleeding than the HAS-BLED score in patients taking DOACs.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and develop a risk score that would provide an effective tool for the clinical assessment of GIB. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data of patients treated with DOACs. The score was developed through logistic regression. The performance of score was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. RESULTS: /L, anaemia, and concurrent antiplatelet agent or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment were independent risk factors for GIB, and concurrent treatment with gastrointestinal protective agents were a protective factor. The Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score was constructed using these 12 factors. The AUC of the Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score was 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.81), which was higher than that of the HAS-BLED score (0.69; 95% CI 0.65-0.72) and the New score (0.65; 95% CI 0.61-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Based on 12 factors, we developed a gastrointestinal bleeding risk score. The newly developed Alfalfa-DOAC-GIB score has better predictive value than the HAS-BLED score and the New score, and might be an effective tool to help reduce the occurrence of GIB in patients using DOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: