Key result
The (ABC)2D score demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding compared to the CRUSADE score (AUC 0.857 vs 0.693, p < 0.001) in patients taking oral antiplatelet drugs.
Why the study?
Antiplatelet drugs can increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, but no specific score exists to predict this risk.
Does the (ABC)2D score improve the prediction of acute gastrointestinal bleeding compared to the CRUSADE score in patients administered oral antiplatelet drugs?
Cohort (n=4,052)
Yes
Does the (ABC)2D score improve the prediction of acute gastrointestinal bleeding compared to the CRUSADE score in patients administered oral antiplatelet drugs?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.857% vs 0.693%
p-value: p=<0.001
The newly developed (ABC)2D score demonstrates superior predictive accuracy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding compared to the CRUSADE score in patients receiving oral antiplatelet therapy.
May aid GI bleeding risk stratification on antiplatelets; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Antiplatelet drugs may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Currently, there is no specific score for predicting the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by oral antiplatelet drugs. In this study, the gastrointestinal bleeding risk score was established and compared with the CRUSADE score in order to reduce the occurrence of clinical gastrointestinal bleeding events. Our study included 4052 patients who received oral antiplatelet drugs. Data were obtained from the patient medical records inpatient system. Cases of acute gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality were recorded. The bleeding score was established by logistic regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Finally, 171 patients had acute gastrointestinal bleeding. The mortality rates of patients in the bleeding and nonbleeding groups were 24.6 and 4.7%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that an age of >65 years, anemia, recent major bleeding, a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, combined oral anticoagulants, and dual antiplatelet therapy are risk factors, and combined proton pump inhibitors are protective factors for acute gastrointestinal bleeding. We used these risk factors to establish a score for predicting acute gastrointestinal bleeding, named (ABC)2D score. The area under the curve for (ABC)2D score was 0.857 (p < 0.001), higher than the CRUSADE score of 0.693 (p < 0.001). The Hosmer–Lemeshow p value was 0.324. We developed the (ABC)2D score based on seven risk factors (i.e., age, anemia, recent major bleeding, a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, no-proton pump inhibitors use, combined oral anticoagulants, and dual antiplatelet therapy). (ABC)2D score was superior to the CRUSADE score. This new risk-scoring model may help to identify patients at a significant risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Patients administered oral antiplatelet drugs (n=4,052). (ABC)2D score vs. CRUSADE score was evaluated on Predictive accuracy (AUC) for acute gastrointestinal bleeding (95% CI 0.818-0.896, p=<0.001). The (ABC)2D score demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding compared to the CRUSADE score (AUC 0.857 vs 0.693, p < 0.001) in patients taking oral antiplatelet drugs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: